近日，黄广中学（原名：广州市黄广中学式举行本学期首次经济辩论赛，国际高一及高二的同学共同参与观摩。
辩论以“妻子年薪几百万，丈夫收入偏低，那丈夫是否应该做全职爸爸？”为主题。
我们的正反两方小辩手又会如何见招拆招呢？
第一回合，双方立论！双方一辩队员分别要在3分钟之内阐述各自的基本观点。
“开始！”随着裁判老师的一声令下，现场战火瞬燃，双方辩手“你来我往”，首个回合的猛烈交锋即全方位展示不畏挑战、向上激扬的精气神，即使尚未正式进入辩论赛最火爆环节，来自不同年级且持不同观点的辩论高手之间已弥漫“火药味”，大有“大战一触即发”之势！
第二回合，自由辩论！双方阵营要开展驳立论并互相提问。
最紧张刺激的“唇枪舌战”拉开帷幕——双方辩手紧抓对手观点的字眼细节提出攻击力饱满的质疑，贯彻“攻守兼顾”的基本原则展开全方位的“猛烈交战”。
其中，正方代表的高二年级学生坚持“创造价值有两种模式，上班工作模式是‘现实回馈’，照顾家庭就属于‘延时回馈’，两种方式没有优劣之分”。
而反方的高一年级同学们则提出“一方退出职场照顾孩子，会造成夫妻双方的脱节，从而影响家庭感情的维系，不利于家庭和睦”。
双方辩手以思想与观念作出无形交锋，在对辩反驳的过程中灵活输出不同立场的有力观点，为现场师生带来不同程度震撼与多元角度的思考，实在难分高下。
第三回合，结辩！双方的四辩都以精准的总结概括再次阐明强调本队的出发观点，为整场辩论赛作出精彩收尾。
据悉，这是国际部首次横跨两个年级举办经济主题辩论赛。辩论赛组织方特别邀请了相关学科老师和学生共同担任评委。观摩辩论的师生评委们从公众演说能力、语言表达能力、逻辑思辨能力和快速反应能力四大方面进行公开、公正的投票评分。
最终，高一年级的反方代表队伍以更胜一筹的整体表现摘得桂冠！
英语辩论赛是黄广中学国际教育模块的重要传统活动，跨越年级的辩论比拼更是基于过往比赛经验的新尝试。这样不仅增强了国际部各年级之间的凝聚力，也扩展了学生们的视野，锻炼了学生的逻辑思辨能力，为同学们提供了锻炼独立思考能力和表达观点能力的绝佳机会，展现了国际部学子奋发向上、敢于争先的精神风貌。
Huangguang school international department economics club debate competition
Recently, the economic club of the Huangguang School international department held an economic debate competition. The students of grade 10 and grade 11 participated in the competition together. For the first time, the club held an economic debate competition between the two grades. The competition invited other business teachers and students to act as judges. In the end, the students of Grade one won the championship, and the students of grade two also showed their talents.
In this debate competition, students had a heated discussion around the topic: "Should a husband be a stay-at-home dad if his wife earns millions of dollars a year and his income is not high?" The students all spoke enthusiastically and put forward many novel and interesting ideas.
The whole debate competition consists of three parts：
In the first part, both sides establish their views. The first debater expounded their basic points in three minutes. The atmosphere was intense, which showed the courage and ability of the debaters on both sides. Although it has not yet reached the summit of the debate competition, it can be seen that the debaters have made adequate preparations.
The second part is free debate, which mainly consists of refutation and mutual questioning. The second part is free debate, which mainly consists of refutation and mutual questioning. Grade two students supported that a husband create value whether they work at home or take care of children. There is no one better than the other, and the husband who at home is also committed to the family." Grade one students proposed that "if one party leaves the workplace to take care of the children, it will cause disconnection between husband and wife, which will affect the maintenance of family affection and is not conducive to family harmony".
The third part is the summary debate stage. The fourth debater of both sides accurately summed up their team's point of view, and made a wonderful ending for the whole debate. Judges scored the debaters on four aspects: speech, language, logical thinking and reaction. In the end, the grade one team won.
This debate competition not only enhanced the cohesion among all grades of the International Department, but also expanded the students' vision and exercised their logical thinking ability. This is a good opportunity to exercise students' ability to think independently and express their opinions. At the same time, this activity also shows the students' spirit of striving to be the first.
